Independent forensic and litigation expertise in AI systems, large language models, agentic systems, and algorithmic decision-making.
Weaknesses identified. Damages quantified. Testimony that holds.
Technical Expertise
Hands-on experience building, deploying, and auditing production AI systems—the same systems giving rise to today's most complex disputes.
Root cause analysis of large language model failures. Whether safeguards were adequate. Industry standard of care for deployment and warnings.
Prior authorization algorithms, claims automation, clinical decision support—algorithmic systems denying care or coverage without adequate review.
Multi-agent systems, autonomous decision-making, tool use—and whether human-in-the-loop controls were properly designed and implemented.
Disparate impact in hiring, lending, insurance, and housing algorithms. Bias detection methodologies. Fairness constraint analysis.
Whether AI development, validation, monitoring, and deployment practices met industry standards and regulatory requirements.
Training data provenance, copyright infringement, ownership of AI-generated content, trade secret misappropriation, and licensing disputes.
Companies overstating AI capabilities, "AI washing," securities disclosure failures, and deceptive practices involving purported AI systems.
Training data collection practices, web scraping legality, consent violations, and processing of personal information by AI systems.
Litigation Support
Written opinions on technical merit, causation, standard of care, and damages quantification.
Clear, authoritative testimony that makes complex AI systems understandable to judges and juries.
Early-stage technical assessment of liability theories, evidentiary gaps, and viable arguments.
Source code review, system architecture analysis, interrogatory assistance, and document review.
Critical analysis of opposing expert opinions. Identification of methodological flaws and unsupported conclusions.
Quantification of harm from AI system failures, including operational impact and remediation costs.
About The Criterion AI
Most AI experts are either academics who've never deployed production systems, or engineers who can't survive a Daubert challenge. The Criterion AI is different—a rare combination of practitioner, scholar, and researcher with 15+ years building, auditing, and publishing on the same AI systems now at the center of high-stakes litigation.
With advanced training from Harvard University and the University of Chicago, award-winning peer-reviewed publications, and hands-on experience across major health systems, federal agencies, and Fortune 500 companies, we deliver forensic technical analysis built for the courtroom—not the classroom.
We work with both plaintiff and defense counsel. Our role is to conduct independent forensic investigation—identifying what failed, why it failed, whether it met the applicable standard of care, and quantifying the resulting harm.
Every engagement begins with rigorous technical investigation: system architecture, training data, model behavior, deployment practices, monitoring controls, and regulatory compliance. We build opinions designed to withstand Daubert scrutiny and aggressive cross-examination.
Industry Experience
Representative Matters
Technical expertise for the full spectrum of AI-related disputes—from model architecture failures to regulatory enforcement.
Engagement Process
15-minute call to assess fit, discuss case facts, and determine how we can help. No charge.
Preliminary technical review to identify strengths, weaknesses, and viable theories before full engagement.
We understand litigation timelines. Fast turnaround on urgent matters when needed.
Retain an Expert
Available for case consultation, preliminary evaluation, expert reports, and testimony. Complimentary 15-minute initial call.
Cambridge, MA · Available Nationwide · Plaintiff & Defense